Argument is war. Strategies are employed to win arguments. Your opponent defends his position by attacking yours.
Hope is light. A glimmer at the end of a tunnel. A ray of sunshine breaking through the clouds.
Time is money. It can be wasted, carelessly invested or saved.
I like metaphors because they say much more than almost any other combination of words. In fact, those statements right there prove the point, but I’ll get to that later.
“It’s just a figure of speech,” you might say – and that’s where you’d be wrong. Metaphors are much more than figures of speech. They are powerful indicators of the way we think and act towards others. In their book, Metaphors We Live By, George Lakoff and Mark Johnson write that “Metaphor[s are] pervasive in everyday life, not just in language but in thought and action. They govern our everyday functioning, down to the most mundane details. Our concepts structure what we perceive, how we get around in the world, and how we relate to other people. Our conceptual system thus plays a central role in defining our everyday realities.”
Enter the grammar Nazi: A metaphor is not a simile. A simile is when I compare one thing to another: “Jack eats like a pig” or “Jill looks like a model.” To say that something is like something else, is to simultaneously admit that it is not in fact that thing.
A metaphor is similar to a simile, grammar Nazi leaves in favor of the redundancy police, in that it links two unrelated topics. But what if I said “Jack is a pig.” I have made a statement about Jack’s character, not just his eating habits. If, to me, Jack isn’t just like a pig; he is a pig, how do you think I will treat Jack? You’re right; like a pig. Better yet, let’s look at the second example I gave: “Jill looks like a model” has a meaning completely different from “Jill is a model.”
So what? How does this affect me? Why does it matter? That is what I call a question that answers itself. The key is in the question “why?” Why do you automatically link the concepts of argument and war, hope and light or time and money together? The answer is so obvious, it is often ignored. You link time and money together because you believe that time can and ought to be treated like money, just like Jill can and ought to be treated like a model.
Let’s take an easier example, something you probably experience in your day to day life. Say there is an old crooked tree at the intersection where you turn to go from your house to the grocery story. Naturally, you refer to that corner as the “crooked tree” corner. If you told your oldest son, “turn right at the crooked tree corner,” he would know exactly what you’re talking about. Assume this goes on for 5-10 years. Sadly, the old crooked tree is struck by lighting and is cut down. Even when the tree is gone, you will naturally refer to the corner as “crooked tree” corner, whether the tree itself exists or not.
Metaphors are no different. They are the natural product of habit—you come to understand time to be like money so in your mind time becomes money, not like money, but it completely takes on the role of money in your mind.
It doesn’t seem like a problem until you turn on the radio or the TV or listen to yourself talk. Then you start to get scared. Really, really fast.
Exhibit A: War metaphor
Last December, CBN, the Christian Broadcasting Network, published a story entitled Christmas Under Siege “From Georgia to Oklahoma, the biblical foundation of Christmas is under attack.” This opening statement begs the question, “under attack by whom?” the answer is obvious: the devil, or better yet, the ACLU. The article goes on to quote David Cortman, Senior Legal Counsel of the Alliance Defense Fund, “The attacks on Christmas are simply part of a larger war being waged on anything and everything Christian. The American people, common sense and the Constitution are clearly winning the battles against Christmas waged by the Left.”
Whether or not you agree with keeping Christ in Christmas, and I do, it is important to understand that this was a legitimate legal debate about the use of public property. If Nietzsche somehow came back from the dead and spent your tax dollars on placing elaborate “GOD IS DEAD” signs all over your public library, you’d be upset too.
Here is the mistake we often make when discussing the battle in churches:
We make the same error that CBS and other fanatical “warriors” often make: we mistake unbelievers for our enemies. We’ve somehow convinced ourselves that we “wrestled not with spiritual forces, but with Democrats, Muslims and Frenchmen.” When we speak of the “fight” for Christian morals in our nation, the “war” for family values and the “battle” for Christ, we are fighting, in some sense, successfully, the wrong enemy.
Dan Nejfelt of Faith In Public Life, a religious blog, writes that “The purpose of war metaphors is to cultivate a sense of fear, outrage and victimhood, and if fear, outrage and victimhood have to be cultivated with absurdly exaggerative rhetoric, those sensibilities are unwarranted. Before we pride ourselves on the fact that we have discovered a new kind of scriptural misinterpretation, we should take a quick look back into history.
The persecution of “heretics” began centuries before the birth of Christ in 385 BC. It wasn’t until 1184 AD, though, that the church began its first official inquisition, most commonly called the Medieval Inquisition. More famous is the Spanish Inquisition, which lasted from 1478 to 1838, nearly 400 years. During this period, Jewish and Muslim converts were executed if they were suspected of adhering to their former beliefs estimates of those killed in the name of religion range from 8.4 million to a startling 112.5 million.
But during the holocaust, war in the name of religion struck a little closer to home. It’s is a sickening reminder that one of Hitler’s primary goals was the elimination of homosexuals in Germany. When we speak carelessly, even in jest, of “shipping all of the gays to France and bombing them” we should immediately realize that we are aligning ourselves with one of the wickedest men that walked the earth.
We are in a battle, a war against spiritual forces, but our war metaphor, specifically that which appears in the church, must be directed at sin and not sinners. We must recall that like homosexuals and yes, even liberals, we frequently make mistakes. If we hate sin, we must learn to hate it in ourselves and in the church before we hate it in others. As Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 5:12, “I’m not responsible for what the outsiders do, but don’t we have some responsibility for those within our community of believers? God decides on the outsiders, but we need to decide when our brothers and sisters are out of line and, if necessary, clean house.” It is imposters within the church, and not sinners outside of it, that we are called to judge.
Exhibition B: Economic Metaphor
I invest in my friendships, I value my family. Your relationships enrich your character, and those who have no friends lead impoverished lives. Did you catch it? We commonly think of our relationships, our love, in economic terms. Donald Miller, in this collection of essays, Blue Like Jazz writes that, “The problem with Christian culture is we think of love as a commodity. We use it like money. If somebody is doing something for us, offering us something, be it gifts, time, popularity, or what have you, we feel they have value, we feel they are worth something to us, and, perhaps, we feel they are priceless. This was the thing that had smelled so rotten all these years. I used love like money. The church used love like money. With love, we withheld affirmation from the people who did not agree with us, but we lavishly financed the ones who did. I used love like money, but love doesn’t work like money. It is not a commodity. When we barter with it, we all lose.”
The other day I was at this graduation for my older brother, and the speaker was a politician with a very strong Cajun accent said something that made me smile, because a friend of mine said it to me months ago and it made me think. “Relationships are like ATM’s,” he said, “you have to make deposits in order to make a withdrawal.”
Put that in your pipe and chew it.
Things get a bit more complicated here:
A study completed by the Schwartz Center shows that metaphors are fundamental to individual and collective expression, [they] are also capable of creating or perpetuating stereotypes, and stigma. If we think of people purely as an economic boon, when they no longer benefit us, we will have no reason to love them unconditionally. How then shall we live? Instead of thinking of love as money, Miller suggests that we use “magnet” metaphor or “free gift” metaphor. What if you could make deposits with no hope of a withdrawal? What if you did make deposits with no hope of withdrawal.
Words are powerful weapons.
